I myself only read the Return of the King and so don’t know much about Bombadil. What I can say is that inserting new/random characters is a make-it or break-it deal. How well they are received depends entirely on the taste (and quite possibly mood) of the audience. And what purpose it serves the story.Krulle wrote: ↑Tue Feb 01, 2022 1:55 pmTY for the analysis of Tom Bombadil.
Very interesting, and quite some astute observations and conclusions.
Would have to re-read the passages to see.
AFAIRemember, Tolkien never intended Tom Bombadil to be "evil", just a merry out-of-place character, like many old tales have something out of place in their tale.
Something actually better suited for the There And Back Again story, but hey. There are more than a few inconsistencies in the universe created by JRR Tolkien. It's his story. I can ignore what I don't like.
Ultimately, TBombadil doesn't have much influence on the story. Just showing that long travels were rich with perils before the state powers secured the roads with the money collected from taxes.
Another example is in the book, Return of the King, There is a scene in which King Theon employs the help of the Woodsmen. If I remember correctly, the Woodsmen seem to guide the Horsemen for a brief period before disappearing into the wilderness never to be seen again. All before the great battle of Minas Tirith. Which I personally found to be anti-climatic. Did they play a pivotal role in the tale? Or was their presence superfluous in the story?
As for inconsistencies, it’s bound to be inevitable. I guess that’s the trick about writing a good story/universe; you can proofread but at the expense of time and energy. Stress too much and you’ll never get your work published.