Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Discussion regarding the Outsider webcomic, science, technology and science fiction.

Moderator: Outsider Moderators

Mk_C
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:35 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Mk_C »

Imagine not expecting 2160 Disney to be an all-powerful interplanetary dominion holding more sway than the TCA, with the true secret purpose behind Scout Corps' TF-32 assignment being discovery of new markets to push Disney+.
dragoongfa wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:39 pm
Only the US version of crony capitalism allows for the trademarking of widely used 'words' and 'items'; try to do the same in the E.U. for example and you will be laughed out of the room. In the end the gamble may pay off for a little while because a lot of Disney's properties have been milked to death; Mickey Mouse and co are simply not profitable enough to bother even if the legal battles weren't in the way.
UK and the reality of Space Marines (tm) would like to have a word.

User avatar
dragoongfa
Posts: 1920
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:26 pm
Location: Athens, Greece

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by dragoongfa »

Mk_C wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:51 pm
Imagine not expecting 2160 Disney to be an all-powerful interplanetary dominion holding more sway than the TCA, with the true secret purpose behind Scout Corps' TF-32 assignment being discovery of new markets to push Disney+.
It's uncertain if Disney can survive the upcoming years due to the Covid lockdown of their theme parks and the subpar expected performance of all their IP lineups going forward. Hell, they may as well have killed Star Wars as a movie franchise with only the streaming based Mandalorian 'spinoff' being able to give some much needed CPR to it; provided they don't fuck things up there again.

Streaming stuff is also going to be rocky going forth because everyone and their mother is trying to put their foot in, resulting in streaming becoming all the more expensive if someone wants to watch every good show out there. IIRC someone crunched the numbers and the combined expense of subscribing to all streaming platforms that produce original content goes up to the 4 digits yearly.


UK and the reality of Space Marines (tm) would like to have a word.
Bad example, fact is that when someone mentions Space Marines they mean Warhammer 40k, at least in the current cultural landscape. As a phrase it exists solely because of said franchise. Better example would be their trademark for 'Warhammer' but that is being challenged right now iirc, it is up renewal in a couple of years and with Brexit the UK based trademarks are now harder to pass muster throughout the world.

MBehave
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:14 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by MBehave »

Drone patrols that are on orbital paths between planets could maintain patrols for a very long time slingshotting around planets and only using fuel to make minor course corrections. It would be far less resource intensive then manned ships or fighters.
GeoModder wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:31 am
MBehave wrote:
Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:22 pm
Drones dont have the problem of life support.
It takes the same amount of fuel to send a drone 1000km at 20km/s stop and return as it does to send it 1000000km at 20km/s stop and return.
GeoModder wrote:
Wed Aug 12, 2020 4:45 pm


I doubt a fighter has the endurance to patrol at days' end.
Sure, but that's for a straight-forward course and back. The whole reason a patrol is out is deterrence.
A drone needing to send and receive commands from light-minutes, if not hours, is a waste of resources.
And in Outsider we are talking about system-wide responsabilities.

User avatar
Quickdraw101
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2020 7:01 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Quickdraw101 »

When looking at the Mjlonir Module, would it be correct to say that it's a strong enough weapon that should it land a hit on a Loroi or Umial vessel, it could cause severe or catastrophic damage with a direct hit? Or is it equivalent to a standard plasma focus weapon the Loroi are familiar with, meaning one hit won't do much of anything?

User avatar
Arioch
Site Admin
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:19 am
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Arioch »

Quickdraw101 wrote:
Sat Feb 27, 2021 8:48 pm
When looking at the Mjlonir Module, would it be correct to say that it's a strong enough weapon that should it land a hit on a Loroi or Umial vessel, it could cause severe or catastrophic damage with a direct hit? Or is it equivalent to a standard plasma focus weapon the Loroi are familiar with, meaning one hit won't do much of anything?
The damage potential of the various weapons are detailed here:
https://well-of-souls.com/outsider/weap ... icle_beams

GrandAdmiralFox
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:37 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by GrandAdmiralFox »

Crossposting from the Loroi thread:
Sweforce wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 11:38 am
The fact that terran ships are restricted to hydrogen fuel doesn't meant that the loroi doesn't use it. I strongly suspect that they use this widely avalible and cheap fuel when able. As such I suspect that this is common on most civilian vessels not involved in supplying warships at the frontline.
Given the likelihood that they're using fusion rockets? I doubt they would be using hydrogen, largely because it balloons their ships far too quickly (1 metric ton of (liquid) hydrogen has a volume of 14.12m^3, (liquid) helium is 6.25m^3, liquid water has 1m^3, and (liquid) methane has 2.3585m^3... you can see the difference is huge here) and, as I said before, has a poor thrust-to-weight ratio when it is all said and done.

Sweforce
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Sweforce »

GrandAdmiralFox wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 12:36 am
Crossposting from the Loroi thread:
Sweforce wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 11:38 am
The fact that terran ships are restricted to hydrogen fuel doesn't meant that the loroi doesn't use it. I strongly suspect that they use this widely avalible and cheap fuel when able. As such I suspect that this is common on most civilian vessels not involved in supplying warships at the frontline.
Given the likelihood that they're using fusion rockets? I doubt they would be using hydrogen, largely because it balloons their ships far too quickly (1 metric ton of (liquid) hydrogen has a volume of 14.12m^3, (liquid) helium is 6.25m^3, liquid water has 1m^3, and (liquid) methane has 2.3585m^3... you can see the difference is huge here) and, as I said before, has a poor thrust-to-weight ratio when it is all said and done.
But it is cheap and require no strategic recources. It is bit like some freight ships during WW1 where still using sails and horses where still widely used during WW2, even for military logistics. Especially strapped for fuel Germany did this.

GrandAdmiralFox
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:37 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by GrandAdmiralFox »

Sweforce wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:31 am
GrandAdmiralFox wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 12:36 am
Crossposting from the Loroi thread:
Sweforce wrote:
Thu Mar 04, 2021 11:38 am
The fact that terran ships are restricted to hydrogen fuel doesn't meant that the loroi doesn't use it. I strongly suspect that they use this widely avalible and cheap fuel when able. As such I suspect that this is common on most civilian vessels not involved in supplying warships at the frontline.
Given the likelihood that they're using fusion rockets? I doubt they would be using hydrogen, largely because it balloons their ships far too quickly (1 metric ton of (liquid) hydrogen has a volume of 14.12m^3, (liquid) helium is 6.25m^3, liquid water has 1m^3, and (liquid) methane has 2.3585m^3... you can see the difference is huge here) and, as I said before, has a poor thrust-to-weight ratio when it is all said and done.
But it is cheap and require no strategic recources. It is bit like some freight ships during WW1 where still using sails and horses where still widely used during WW2, even for military logistics. Especially strapped for fuel Germany did this.
When you actually get into the nitty-gritty of it... hydrogen is expensive in everything else that matters. It's too voluminous (14 cubic meters is a lot) and the square-cubed law is a harsh mistress (meaning a ship has less armor than ships with more compact volumes).

Water is far more useful than hydrogen despite its mass.

Sweforce
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Sweforce »

GrandAdmiralFox wrote:
Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:00 am
Sweforce wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:31 am
GrandAdmiralFox wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 12:36 am
Crossposting from the Loroi thread:

Given the likelihood that they're using fusion rockets? I doubt they would be using hydrogen, largely because it balloons their ships far too quickly (1 metric ton of (liquid) hydrogen has a volume of 14.12m^3, (liquid) helium is 6.25m^3, liquid water has 1m^3, and (liquid) methane has 2.3585m^3... you can see the difference is huge here) and, as I said before, has a poor thrust-to-weight ratio when it is all said and done.
But it is cheap and require no strategic recources. It is bit like some freight ships during WW1 where still using sails and horses where still widely used during WW2, even for military logistics. Especially strapped for fuel Germany did this.
When you actually get into the nitty-gritty of it... hydrogen is expensive in everything else that matters. It's too voluminous (14 cubic meters is a lot) and the square-cubed law is a harsh mistress (meaning a ship has less armor than ships with more compact volumes).

Water is far more useful than hydrogen despite its mass.
I was thinking of the fuel used by the humanity in the Outsider setting. It was not tanks full of water that blew up at the second hit on the Bellarmine.

Mk_C
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:35 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Mk_C »

GrandAdmiralFox wrote:
Fri Mar 05, 2021 12:36 am
Crossposting from the Loroi thread:
Given the likelihood that they're using fusion rockets? I doubt they would be using hydrogen, largely because it balloons their ships far too quickly (1 metric ton of (liquid) hydrogen has a volume of 14.12m^3, (liquid) helium is 6.25m^3, liquid water has 1m^3, and (liquid) methane has 2.3585m^3... you can see the difference is huge here) and, as I said before, has a poor thrust-to-weight ratio when it is all said and done.
Insider Forum Digest: Humanity in 2160, "The Bellarmine Incident" wrote: The Bellarmine's main tanks would have been liquid hydrogen, fuel for a fusion drive.

MBehave
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:14 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by MBehave »

With outsider tech its in theory possible to store hydrogen at high densities.
need to assume artificial gravity follows normal gravity rules, its not a force and energy is not lost or gained in total its a zerosum system.

Storing hydrogen can be done by gravity compression, further the compression itself would represent an energy storage method for ships effectively a battery so even if main power is lost as long as the containment/gravity compression system is not damaged it would continue to function. With the gravity system allowing the hydrogen to expand to extract energy, compressing it uses energy, maintaining compression does neither as it isn't a "force."

The amount of energy you could in theory store in such a system would be staggering approaching 1:1 with fusion at near fusion igniting levels of compression.
Upper safe limit for hydrogen compression storage before fusion is about 40g cm/3, it could also explain why the Bellarmine blew up, losing gravity compression on its hydrogen tanks even at say 1g m/3(1 ton per m3) would be destructive.

Tiamat could actually be anti hydrogen stored in such a manner.

Mk_C
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:35 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Mk_C »

MBehave wrote:
Sat Mar 20, 2021 6:32 pm
the compression itself would represent an energy storage method for ships effectively a battery so even if main power is lost as long as the containment/gravity compression system is not damaged it would continue to function.
Curiously enough, we know that the gravity control system on the Bennet-class is stoopidly robust - as Jardin, Kirkland and the rest of the damage control team are still walking around after the ship was cut in half, lost it's main power, air pressure on most decks, and even most of the emergency lighting.

boldilocks
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2017 3:27 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by boldilocks »

Mk_C wrote:
Sun Mar 21, 2021 1:00 pm
MBehave wrote:
Sat Mar 20, 2021 6:32 pm
the compression itself would represent an energy storage method for ships effectively a battery so even if main power is lost as long as the containment/gravity compression system is not damaged it would continue to function.
Curiously enough, we know that the gravity control system on the Bennet-class is stoopidly robust - as Jardin, Kirkland and the rest of the damage control team are still walking around after the ship was cut in half, lost it's main power, air pressure on most decks, and even most of the emergency lighting.
Could be magnetized suit boots.

Dan Wyatt
Posts: 220
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2020 6:17 pm
Location: Eurasia
Contact:

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Dan Wyatt »

Mk_C wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:51 pm
Imagine not expecting 2160 Disney to be an all-powerful interplanetary dominion holding more sway than the TCA, with the true secret purpose behind Scout Corps' TF-32 assignment being discovery of new markets to push Disney+.
dragoongfa wrote:
Mon Feb 22, 2021 4:39 pm
Only the US version of crony capitalism allows for the trademarking of widely used 'words' and 'items'; try to do the same in the E.U. for example and you will be laughed out of the room. In the end the gamble may pay off for a little while because a lot of Disney's properties have been milked to death; Mickey Mouse and co are simply not profitable enough to bother even if the legal battles weren't in the way.
UK and the reality of Space Marines (tm) would like to have a word.
Mickey Mouse Death Squads

Roeben
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Roeben »

We know what loroi smell like to humans.

What do humans smell like to loroi, equivalently?

Inquiring minds need to know.

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1039
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by GeoModder »

Roeben wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 2:06 pm
What do humans smell like to loroi, equivalently?
To Tenoins hailing from Taben, low tide!
Image

Mk_C
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 11:35 am

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Mk_C »

Roeben wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 2:06 pm
What do humans smell like to loroi, equivalently?
Like salt, ofc.

Yes, NaCl is odorless - for humans, that is.

User avatar
Werra
Posts: 840
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:27 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by Werra »

According to many East Asians, humans often smell like milk.

boldilocks
Posts: 669
Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2017 3:27 pm

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by boldilocks »

Werra wrote:
Thu Apr 01, 2021 6:13 pm
According to many East Asians, humans often smell like milk.
Indeed, I have often heard east asians comment on this on those rare occasions when they happen to interact with humans :lol:

jterlecki
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:24 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada

Re: Miscellaneous Terran question-and-answer thread

Post by jterlecki »

I was thinking, not every aspect of science and technology advances at the same rate. What would be the area of science and tech that humans are most advanced in?

Post Reply