Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Discussion regarding the Outsider webcomic, science, technology and science fiction.

Moderator: Outsider Moderators

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Trantor »

Arioch wrote:(detailed answer on weapon systems deleted...)
...

I have on my list to add an Insider page on the various weapons systems, and that's most likely when those details will be worked out.
So, how about some speculation? :D

@Arioch: This isn´t meant as critique or pushing a request programme. You can be proud of your art, and for instance i remember well when Madsniper from White Noise went ballistic after some smartass showed up in her discussion forum giving smart advice. That´s not what i want.

Let´s just throw in some thoughts about possible/impossible weapons or weapons from rarely known sf-operas, their abilities, requirements and drawbacks.

I start with Orion-7´s Overkill Device:
Sets off a Sub-Gluon-level chainreaction (technobabble-alert ;)) by disturbing wave-particle balance. Destroys theoretically everything from capital ships to black holes (!). No countermeasures possible (e.g. shields).

Can be mounted on ships as small as fast cruisers, but excessive computingpower is required the further the target is away. Range up to 30 LS practically, with no limits theoretically if you have access to infinite computingpower.
Can be set off backwards in time, but this was strictly forbidden by both Central Command and GSD (secret service) due to severe problems with time-travel-paradoxes and insufficient calculation possibilities.
General van Dyke refused to install this weapon on her flagship Hydra and delegated it to McLane´s Orion.

Drawbacks: OD is unpredictable. There´s everything from fail to total consumption of target. Flashovers to the firing/unleashing ship possible if distance is too low, and likely if fired in gas-, plasma- or proplyd clouds. NEVER unleash it in direction of your own engine plumes! Long charge time (several minutes), on long distance even longer calculation time. Not suitable on high manouvreable targets.
TRAV (intel/sigint) is always p*ssed when OD is unleashed without previous notice because ALL sensors pointing to the hemisphere (!) of the theater are toast.
OD has an impact on FTL communication and Jumps, sometimes even far away from the theater.
Device wears out rapidly, then endangering the own ship even on idle. OD also is excessively expensive, time-consuming and complicated to build and adjust.

OD has more drawbacks than a stray dog fleas, but it´s THE most powerful weapon with regards to destruction.
Use it wise (or in acute danger as a last resort) and scarcely. ;)


Edit: On a side note from the now defunct german Raumpatrouille-Forum, OD was developed by "New Telefunken", company motto: "Insane and proud of it!" :D
sapere aude.

Majincarne
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:06 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Majincarne »

Superweapons always have some drawback. Otherwise they are just weapons and you sprinkle them about your hull like candy toppers.

Fiction superweapons are mostly limited by some rarity; resource, power consumption, logistics factor.
Real life superweapons are limited by effect that are unwanted by the user, Nukes are radioactive/fck with the climate if enough are used. Biological weapons keep going most of the time after you want them to stop. And chemical can waft back on to your troops land ect. Also civilians will usually be rite ticked at you with using those as well.

Basically real life we dont care about the cost we'll just build a thousand instead of 10 and make up the savings in bulk. In fiction there has to be some reason why its not the main gun on every ship, where probably IRL there would be 3 on each ship. Otherwise its not "the superweapon" plot point anymore.

Macross got sorta close to this with the Macross cannon as they mostly used it whenever they got a good clean shot on some ships. It fits the superweapon category but theres no " its bad to use because list" So they smash the "Win" button allot as would most reasonable people. Most writers try and keep teh god gun from going off every other episode, they feel it looses something [plot]. Where as someone in a fight with someone just wants to win and will throw the biggest punch they have at a good excuse.

TrashMan
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by TrashMan »

Pffft...Reflex Cannon.

Beat this:
Image

dfacto
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:50 am

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by dfacto »

The big discussion about linacs vs railguns got me thinking about cyclotrons, but some further reading revealed that they don't work at any particle speeds above a few percent of c due to relativistic effects messing up the interaction with the alternating magnetic fields.

So not willing to let a neat idea die, I just figured you could use a synchrotron for a gun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchrotron

A 100m diameter synchrotron accelerating particles to near light speed. And since it's all magnetically levitated, the particles are antimatter. That ought to leave a mark.

*disclaimer: I don't care what physics has to say about this, rule of cool is in effect.

User avatar
Siber
Posts: 362
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 5:10 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Siber »

If we're just talking about random weapons from other sci-fi, I've been thinking lately about Andromeda's nova bombs. Their stated effect is simple, even if their mechanism is unknowable. They turn off gravity. As a weapon system they're completely worthless in ship to ship combat, they don't do a thing. Drop one on a star, however, and things get a bit exciting. And their standard ships of the line carry forty as standard armament...
Atomic Space Race, a hard sci-fi orbital mechanics puzzle game.
Homeworld Fulcrum, a Homeworld Remastered Mod

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Trantor »

Siber wrote:If we're just talking about random weapons from other sci-fi...
Not necessarily.
Siber wrote:I've been thinking lately about Andromeda's nova bombs. Their stated effect is simple, even if their mechanism is unknowable. They turn off gravity. As a weapon system they're completely worthless in ship to ship combat, they don't do a thing. Drop one on a star, however, and things get a bit exciting. And their standard ships of the line carry forty as standard armament...
Throw it on a binary system, and you´ll have two runaways...
sapere aude.

User avatar
Cdr Straker
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:18 am
Location: SHADO HQ

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Cdr Straker »

Majincarne wrote:Superweapons always have some drawback. Otherwise they are just weapons and you sprinkle them about your hull like candy toppers.

Fiction superweapons are mostly limited by some rarity; resource, power consumption, logistics factor.
Real life superweapons are limited by effect that are unwanted by the user, Nukes are radioactive/fck with the climate if enough are used. Biological weapons keep going most of the time after you want them to stop. And chemical can waft back on to your troops land ect. Also civilians will usually be rite ticked at you with using those as well.

Basically real life we dont care about the cost we'll just build a thousand instead of 10 and make up the savings in bulk. In fiction there has to be some reason why its not the main gun on every ship, where probably IRL there would be 3 on each ship. Otherwise its not "the superweapon" plot point anymore.

Macross got sorta close to this with the Macross cannon as they mostly used it whenever they got a good clean shot on some ships. It fits the superweapon category but theres no " its bad to use because list" So they smash the "Win" button allot as would most reasonable people. Most writers try and keep teh god gun from going off every other episode, they feel it looses something [plot]. Where as someone in a fight with someone just wants to win and will throw the biggest punch they have at a good excuse.
....which points out the crazy hypocracy of the "Neutron Bomb" debacle. Back in the '70s, the US invented a nuclear weapon that, when detonated, produced little blast/heat effect and a commisurately reduced fallout. The remaining energy, however, was converted into a wave of fast neutrons, fatally ionizing every living thing within line-of-site or behind inadequate shielding (like- a mountain.... a big one). Detonate one over a city and the inhabitants- all of them... and their pets- are dead, but the city is only moderately damaged and free of radioactive contamination. When the characteristics of the weapon were disclosed, the public went mad- on both sides of the iron curtain. It seems that, if you make a WMD (in this case the D is for death, not destruction) with no down-side, everyone will be afraid it will be used. Maybe they're right. On the other hand, I can promise you that if a first-strike against the U.S. had been detected, none of the down-sides of our then-current inventory would have prevented their deployment. So instead of depopulated cities, we would have a series of smoking craters where the cities used to be. Does that make anyone feel better?
We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm
-George Orwell

User avatar
Ktrain
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 12:39 am

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Ktrain »

The French specialized in neutron bombs and they were designed to incapacitate Russian armor units. Furthermore, these weapons are relatively survivable. If one were underground in a relatively simple shelter when such a weapon was detonated, one would most likely
not be harmed. Neutron bombs are not a "super weapon;" they are a weapons with a very specialized purpose in asymmetrical warfare.
OUTSIDER UPDATE => HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED?

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Trantor »

Majincarne wrote:Real life superweapons are limited by effect that are unwanted by the user, Nukes are radioactive/fck with the climate if enough are used. Biological weapons keep going most of the time after you want them to stop.
This is a cool aspect i didn´t see before. Heck, i saw Blade Runner, but of course bacteria etc could also be modified.
I think it´d be valid to say that genetic engineering (at least in SF) could vastly improve on that. Hell, a new (hellish) world!
Majincarne wrote:Macross got sorta close to this with the Macross cannon as they mostly used it whenever they got a good clean shot on some ships. It fits the superweapon category but theres no " its bad to use because list" So they smash the "Win" button allot as would most reasonable people.
That´d be boring.
Because real Heroes are born only in desperation.

Cdr Straker wrote:(on neutron bombs)
...When the characteristics of the weapon were disclosed, the public went mad- on both sides of the iron curtain.
Which was a good thing BTW.
Cdr Straker wrote:So instead of depopulated cities, we would have a series of smoking craters where the cities used to be. Does that make anyone feel better?
This a trick discussion. "Choose A OR B". Well, i choose none of them. ;)
sapere aude.

User avatar
Rosen_Ritter_1
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Rosen_Ritter_1 »

Trantor wrote: That´d be boring.
Because real Heroes are born only in desperation.
Except given the scale of the opposition the Macross is dealing with, the Macross cannon doesn't really qualify as a super weapon.

Sure, it can one shot an enemy ship. But the enemy even at their lowest point had TENS OF THOUSANDS of capitol ships within the Sol system. Even the beefed up version of the Macross cannon they had in antarctica which was capable of wiping out thousands of Zentradi ships at once was strategically irrelevant given the Zentradi numbers.


See, if humanity Macross had ANY super weapon, it was J-pop.*

*In fact, the most effective strategy humanity might have taken would have been to surrender to the Breetai fleet right away.

Majincarne
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 12:06 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Majincarne »

See, if humanity Macross had ANY super weapon, it was J-pop.*

*In fact, the most effective strategy humanity might have taken would have been to surrender to the Breetai fleet right away.
I never thought about it that way, but your right. Or at least drag on surrender negotiations for a few months.

Voitan
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:04 am

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Voitan »

Humanity's super weapon is DECULTURE!

There might be some amusing parrallels within Outsider regarding that...

TrashMan
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by TrashMan »

Rosen_Ritter_1 wrote: See, if humanity Macross had ANY super weapon, it was J-pop.*
Culture...not J-pop. In the original Macross, Zentradi were exposed to human culture and were beginning to splinter and defect. Music/singing was just there to tip the already wobbly scale.

It's in the sequels where the horiblness of J-pop as weapon truly begun. Everything except the Original Macross is dead to me.

User avatar
Rosen_Ritter_1
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Rosen_Ritter_1 »

TrashMan wrote: Culture...not J-pop. In the original Macross, Zentradi were exposed to human culture and were beginning to splinter and defect. Music/singing was just there to tip the already wobbly scale.

It's in the sequels where the horiblness of J-pop as weapon truly begun. Everything except the Original Macross is dead to me.
Wait. Really? Someone didn't remember that the Zentradi being defeated by J-pop was just the memetic thing to say?


Ah well. It's not like I had much interest in many of the Macross series post the original series/movie and Macross Plus anyhow.

AndrejaKo
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:25 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by AndrejaKo »

+1 for the culture.

Does anyone here remember Zentradi reactions to a "simple" kiss? I'd say that they were worse than J-Pop.

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Trantor »

TrashMan wrote:
Rosen_Ritter_1 wrote:See, if humanity Macross had ANY super weapon, it was J-pop.*
Culture...not J-pop. In the original Macross, Zentradi were exposed to human culture and were beginning to splinter and defect. Music/singing was just there to tip the already wobbly scale.

It's in the sequels where the horiblness of J-pop as weapon truly begun. Everything except the Original Macross is dead to me.
Voitan wrote:Humanity's super weapon is DECULTURE!

There might be some amusing parrallels within Outsider regarding that...
AndrejaKo wrote:+1 for the culture.

Does anyone here remember Zentradi reactions to a "simple" kiss? I'd say that they were worse than J-Pop.
Guys, you´re dragging this into a whole new direction.
















I like it. :mrgreen:
sapere aude.

Voitan
Posts: 214
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:04 am

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Voitan »

TrashMan wrote:
Rosen_Ritter_1 wrote: See, if humanity Macross had ANY super weapon, it was J-pop.*
Culture...not J-pop. In the original Macross, Zentradi were exposed to human culture and were beginning to splinter and defect. Music/singing was just there to tip the already wobbly scale.

It's in the sequels where the horiblness of J-pop as weapon truly begun. Everything except the Original Macross is dead to me.
*Gasp!* Not even Macross Frontier!?

That show is pretty damn good...

And Zero and Plus, also very good, IMO.

User avatar
Imbrooge
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:17 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by Imbrooge »

My first exposure to Macross was the one with the crazy A.I. idol going crazy and snagging that heroine chick in electric wire bondage.

Anyways culture as a weapon, eh? Ranged Foot Massage anyone?

TrashMan
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by TrashMan »

Voitan wrote: *Gasp!* Not even Macross Frontier!?

That show is pretty damn good...

And Zero and Plus, also very good, IMO.

Hell no. Macross keeps getting stupider in every possible way with each "sequel". The visuals might improve, but the core is rotten and falling apart.

Macross Plus was OK
Zero has massive potential (best macross visuals and air battlesto date), but the horrible bird-human and song-power killed it.

And everything else? I don't even want to comment on soul-sucking aliens, J-pop power, and idiot-ball characters. Just...no.

TrashMan
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Random Discussion on Weapon Systems

Post by TrashMan »

Imbrooge wrote:My first exposure to Macross was the one with the crazy A.I. idol going crazy and snagging that heroine chick in electric wire bondage.

Anyways culture as a weapon, eh? Ranged Foot Massage anyone?
I was actually thinking broadcasting our weirdest p0rn on all channels and frequencies.
Let the melting of alien brainz commence.


...


Altough it would be funny if that just turned the aliens into sex-crazed maniacs...

Post Reply